Cases 51 - 60 of 97
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01165
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Eck v. Battle et al
as 1:2014cv00962
Plaintiff:
Trisha Eck
Defendant:
Tanja D. Battle , Richard Bennett , Logan (Buzzy) Nalley, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Faircloth v. Olens et al
as 1:2013cv04158
Plaintiff:
Dan Robert Faircloth
Defendant:
Samuel S. Olens, Georgia Department of Corrections and Brian Owens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rainbow Push Coalition et al v. Deal et al
as 1:2013cv03635
Plaintiff:
Rainbow Push Coalition , Herman Smith and The Estate of James Christopher Johnson III
Defendant:
Nathan Deal and Samuel S. Olens
Intervenor:
GeorgiaCarry.Org, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Pruitt et al v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
as 5:2013cv00726
Plaintiff:
Scott Pruitt , Luther Strange , Tom Horne and others
Defendant:
United States Environmental Protection Agency, Eric H Holder, Jr and Sanford C Coats
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv02303
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Commoditas Georgia, LLC v. Deal et al
as 1:2013cv02131
Plaintiff:
Commoditas Georgia, LLC
Defendant:
Nathan Deal and Samuel S. Olens
Amicu:
Georgia Amusement and Music Operators of Georgia, Inc.
Faircloth v. Olens et al
as 1:2013cv01975
Plaintiff:
Don Robert Faircloth
Defendant:
Samuel S. Olens, Georgia Dept. of Corrections and Brian Owens
Edwards v. Jacobs et al
as 5:2013cv00053
Petitioner:
Carl Edwards, III
Respondent:
Rick Jacobs and Samuel S. Olens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wright v. Polk County et al
as 4:2013cv00119
Plaintiff:
Byron Scott Wright
Defendant:
Polk County, Baldwin County, Randall Hines and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
