Cases 1 - 10 of 5,689
DIAZ v. CAMACHO et al
as 2:2024cv03737
Plaintiff:
D. DIAZ
Defendant:
PAUL CAMACHO, N. CALVILLO, G. PRECIADO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martinez Sarmiento, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2821
Petitioner:
ADRIANA MARTINEZ SARMIENTO, JHAIR MEJIA SANCHEZ, EMMANUEL MEJIA MARTINEZ and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. v. Ruiz et al
as 5:2024cv02669
Plaintiff:
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. doing business as Integrated Sports Media
Defendant:
Benjamin Jean Ruiz, Tibisay Sanchez, Carloa Andres Garcia individually doing business as La Terraza Grill & Bar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1934
Sanchez v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv03650
Plaintiff:
Marvin Sanchez
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Sanchez Chavez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2770
Petitioner:
CARLOS SANCHEZ CHAVEZ, BRISEIDA KRISTELLE LOPEZ DE LA TORRE, CARLOS EMMANUEL SANCHEZ LOPEZ and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Sanchez v. General Motors, LLC
as 3:2024cv00780
Plaintiff:
Viviana Sanchez
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 231
King v. Sanchez et al
as 4:2024cv02571
Plaintiff:
Troy Demond King
Defendant:
Sheriff Yesenia L. Sanchez, Marcella Hardy, Alan Horwitz and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00729
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Sanchez-Vasquez v. Garland
as 24-2749
Petitioner:
MISAEL OMAR SANCHEZ-VASQUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Sanchez et al v. City of Fremont
as 3:2024cv02584
Plaintiff:
Kimberlee Sanchez, Samantha Jost, Kaleb Durmas and others
Defendant:
City of Fremont
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
