Cases 61 - 70 of 4,568
Sanchez v. LNU 5:24-CV-035-H
as 5:2024cv00035
Petitioner:
Matthew Quinton Sanchez
Respondent:
FNU LNU 5:24-CV-035-H
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Debellis v. Sanchez
as 1:2024cv00764
Plaintiff:
Anthony Debellis
Defendant:
Alexander Sanchez, Esq.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Angel-Crowell et al v. Galveston Police Department et al
as 3:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
Brandon James Angel-Crowell and Mariano Medellin Sanchez
Defendant:
Galveston Police Department, Galveston County Jail and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez v. Mac et al
as 2:2024cv00185
Plaintiff:
Edward J. Perez
Defendant:
E Mac, Brown, Castroll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Harris v. Delafuente et al
as 1:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
Marvin Harris
Defendant:
L. Delafuente, E. Espalin, I. Sanchez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tyrrell et al v. Nagy et al
as 2:2024cv10250
Plaintiff:
Anthony David Thomas, Steven Sanchez, John Warren Ross and others
Defendant:
Richard Lee Robinson, William Charles Valkema, Creston Jerome Hicks and others
Petitioner:
Bobbie Maxwell, Benjamin Ballge, Richard Schall and others
(HC) Sanchez v. Cates
as 2:2024cv00323
Petitioner:
Alejandro Sanchez
Defendant:
B. Cates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sanchez v. USA
as 3:2024cv00177
Petitioner:
Miguel Angel Sanchez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
(HC) Sanchez v. Cates
as 1:2024cv00134
Petitioner:
Alejandro Sanchez
Defendant:
B. Cates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Russell v. Gonzalez et al
as 3:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
Jamelle Russell
Defendant:
M. Gonzalez, Garrett, Collier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
