Cases 31 - 40 of 96
Siddiqui et al v. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) et al
as 0:2020cv01325
Petitioner:
M. Siddiqui, Kwasi Ampofo, Jose Hugo Pineda Mendoza and others
Respondent:
State Attorney Generals from MN and all other States, William Barr, Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2020cv00793
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Sanchez-Sanchez v. Beltz
as 0:2019cv02693
Respondent:
Tracy Beltz
Petitioner:
Julian Sanchez-Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Despot et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02236
Plaintiff:
Adam Mulvey, Richard Buchanan, Brett Norton and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Rojas et al v. Saulsberry et al
as 0:2019cv02208
Plaintiff:
Jose Filiberto Rojas, Dustin Jay Sanderlin, Ryan Schuck and others
Defendant:
Aearo, LLC, Aearo Holdings, LLC, 3M Company and others
Crittenden et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02182
Plaintiff:
Jose Sierra, Lajordan Crittenden, Donald Jones and others
Defendant:
Aearo Technologies LLC and 3M Company
Buford et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02159
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Weiland, Ryan Rockriver, Randy Lawson and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Schroeder et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02086
Plaintiff:
Brent Borck, Hughie Boggs, Marcus Alexander and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Perez et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02024
Plaintiff:
Thelmore Cumby, Austin Dyer, Seth Southerland and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Bretz et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv01996
Plaintiff:
Conrad Moore, Seth Willford, Benjamin Price and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
