Cases 1 - 7 of 7
G&G Closed Circuit Events LLC v. Mezcales Grill LLC et al
as 2:2019cv00666
Defendant:
Cristobal Mondragon, Mezcales Grill, LLC, Sandra Mendoza and others
Plaintiff:
G&G Closed Circuit Events LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605
Southern California Institute v. The State of Bar of California, et al
as 14-55690
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF LAW, a California corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
THE STATE OF BAR OF CALIFORNIA, THE COMMITTEE OF BAR EXAMINERS, JAMES H. AGUIRRE, individually and in his official capacity and others
Southern California Institute of Law v. The State of Bar of California et al
as 2:2014cv00996
Defendant:
James H. Aguirre, James H. Aguirre, Archie Joe Biggers and others
Plaintiff:
Southern California Institute of Law
Santos et al v. City of Santa Rosa et al
as 4:2013cv04848
Plaintiff:
Rocio Nunez Santos and Sandra Mendoza
Defendant:
City of Santa Rosa and Michael Lazzarini
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Southern California Institute v. Archie Biggers, et al
as 13-56718
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF LAW, a California corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
ARCHIE JOE BIGGERS, individually and official capacity, JAMES A. BOLTON, individually and official capacity, J. SCOTT BOVITZ, individually and official capacity and others
So. Calif. Institute of Law v. Archie Biggers, et al
as 13-56226
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF LAW, a California corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
ARCHIE JOE BIGGERS, individually and official capacity, JAMES A. BOLTON, individually and official capacity, J. SCOTT BOVITZ, individually and official capacity and others
Southern California Institute of Law v. Archie Joe Biggers et al
as 8:2013cv00193
Defendant:
Archie Joe Biggers, Archie Joe Biggers, James A Bolton and others
Plaintiff:
Southern California Institute of Law
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
