Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00481
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00249
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00287
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Webber v. Dallas Independent School District et al
as 3:2023cv00395
Plaintiff:
Delorise Webber
Defendant:
Dallas Independent School District, Jesus Martinez, ELAR Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Schmal v. Luna County et al
as 7:2020cv00277
Defendant:
Does 1 - 25, Deming Animal Guardians, Captain Michael Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond William Schmal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00902
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv03449
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00215
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv01802
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Bonin, et al v. Sabine River Authority of Texas, et al
as 1:2019cv00527
Plaintiff:
Perry Bonin, Lovie D Garlington, Lucille Morris and others
Defendant:
Sabine River Authority of Texas, Tobin Holbrook and Sabine River Authority, State of Louisiana
Amicus Curiae:
Texas Water Conservation Association
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
