Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00666
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination
Clervrain et al v. Wahl et al (MAG+)
as 2:2022cv00024
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain, Ronaldo Jean, Brandako, Inc and others
Defendant:
John Wahl, John Skipper, Sallie Bryant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Avendano et al v. Shaw (CONSENT)
as 1:2020cv00843
Defendant:
Victoria Shaw
Plaintiff:
Angel Avendano and Sandy Knowles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Byrd et al v. Buckner et al
as 2:2018cv00122
Plaintiff:
Sandy Byrd , Jonathan Ponstein , Leeann Ponstein and others
Defendant:
Nancy Buckner , Kim Mashego , Kierra Carey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Strozier v. The City of Lanett et al
as 3:2017cv00853
Plaintiff:
Sandy L. Strozier
Defendant:
The City of Lanett, Kyle McCoy and Jason Abernathy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Colvin
as 3:2014cv01050
Plaintiff:
Sandy Y. Walker
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Shepherd v. Colvin (CONSENT)
as 2:2013cv00277
Plaintiff:
Sandy Jean Shepherd
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
State of Alabama v. PCI Gaming Authority et al
as 2:2013cv00178
Plaintiff:
State of Alabama
Defendant:
PCI Gaming Authority , Buford Rolin , Stephanie Bryan and others
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 2701 Indian Gaming Regulation
Muscogee Creek Nation, et al v. Poarch Band of Creek Indians, et al
as 2:2012cv01079
Plaintiff:
Muscogee Creek Nation , Hickory Ground Tribal Town and George Thompson
Defendant:
Poarch Band of Creek Indians , Stephanie Bryan , Robert McGhee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
