Cases 1 - 10 of 24
CHAPMAN v. STATE OF GEORGIA
as 5:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
YAQUAN LAVETT SANDY CHAPMAN
Respondent:
STATE OF GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WILLIS et al v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 5:2023cv00430
Plaintiff:
CHERALE WILLIS, TIFFANEY PEACOCK, SANDY COLBERT and others
Defendant:
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY doing business as GEICO and GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY doing business as GEICO
SANFORD v. 3040 LITTLE SANDY LLC
as 5:2023cv00099
Plaintiff:
VINCE ERIC SANDFORD
Defendant:
3040 LITTLE SANDY LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
BOWDEN et al v. TERMINIX INTERNATIONAL INC et al
as 1:2022cv00208
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Bowden and Sandy Bowden
Defendant:
Terminix International Inc and TMX Holdco
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
DAKER v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00342
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, BRIAN OWENS, HOMER BRYSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COLSTON v. DOLLAR TREE STORES INC et al
as 5:2022cv00057
Plaintiff:
SANDY COLSTON
Defendant:
DOLLAR TREE STORES INC and JOHN DOE INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DAKER v. WARD
as 5:2019cv00365
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, PARALEGAL JAMIE A VALLEE, LISA FOUNTAIN and others
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AIKEN v. PHILPIN et al
as 5:2019cv00054
Defendant:
MARK TAYLOR, LIEUTENANT LESTER, ANGELA GLOVER and others
Plaintiff:
JAY JUNIOR AIKEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CANTY v. PRIOR et al
as 5:2017cv00237
Plaintiff:
MARTIN CANTY
Defendant:
WILLIAM A PRIOR, JR, CLINT C MALCOLM, HULANE E GEORGE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00220
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
