Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Diamond v. City of Sandy et al
as 3:2022cv00346
Plaintiff:
Chelsea Diamond
Defendant:
City of Sandy, Clackamas County, Michael Boyes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McCarter v. Brown et al
as 6:2020cv01048
Defendant:
Bobbi Childers, Renee Kolen, Brenda Percy and others
Plaintiff:
Michael R. McCarter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Elizondo et al v. City of Junction City et al
as 6:2019cv01723
Defendant:
Sandee Thomas, Dale Rowe, Jason Knope and others
Plaintiff:
Jesse Elizondo and Randee Elizondo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01339
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv01786
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv01749
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Doe v. University of Oregon, et. al
as 6:2017cv01103
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Robin Holmes, Carol Millie, University of Oregon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Portland Community College et al
as 3:2017cv01069
Defendant:
Kevin Lein, Alexie McNerthy, Al McQuarters and others
Plaintiff:
Carol Adrianne Smith
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Artis et al v. University of Oregon et al
as 6:2016cv00647
Plaintiff:
Dominic Artis and Damyean Dotson
Defendant:
Michael R. Gottfredson, Robin Holmes, Chicora Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Austin v. University of Oregon et al
as 6:2015cv02257
Plaintiff:
Brandon Austin
Defendant:
Michael R. Gottfredson, Robin Holmes, Chicora Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
