Cases 41 - 50 of 58
Stoker v. Sandy City et al
as 2:2011cv01049
Plaintiff:
K. Stoker
Defendant:
Sandy City, Tom Dolan, Douglas A. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ambuehl et al v. Aames Funding et al
as 2:2011cv00693
Plaintiff:
John Ambuehl , Mara Ambuehl , Oliver Bigler and others
Defendant:
Aames Funding, Aegis Wholesale, American Home Mortgage Acceptance and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mismash et al v. Sandy City et al
as 2:2011cv00392
Plaintiff:
Andrew Mismash and Kristin Mismash
Defendant:
Sandy City , Sandy City Police Department , Stephen M. Chapman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Crawford v. Sandy, City of et al
as 2:2011cv00351
Plaintiff:
Brad Crawford
Defendant:
Sandy, City of and Ryan Metcalf
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ambuhel et al v. ABN AMRO Mortgage Group et al
as 2:2011cv00133
Plaintiff:
John Ambuhel , Mara Ambuhel , Oliver Bigler and others
Defendant:
ABN AMRO Mortgage Group, Aames Funding, Aegis Wholesale and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00570
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Big Daddy's Pizza Restaurant v. Sandy City
as 2:2010cv00475
Plaintiff:
Big Daddy's Pizza Restaurant
Defendant:
Sandy City
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Utahns for Ethical Government v. Barton et al
as 2:2010cv00333
Plaintiff:
Utahns for Ethical Government
Defendant:
Paul B. Barton, Robert P. Pero, Diane Freston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gascoigne v. Gascoigne et al
as 2:2009cv00734
Plaintiff:
Julie Gascoigne
Defendant:
Paul Gascoigne and Sandy Gascoigne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Golf Savings Bank v. Lowe
as 2:2009cv00646
Plaintiff:
Golf Savings Bank and Golf Savings Bank
Defendant:
Sandy Lowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
