Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Allbritton, et al v. Johnson & Johnson, et al
as 13-6297
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SARAH RUTH ALLBRITTON, WARREN BELL, EVELYN BROWNLEE and others
Defendant - Appellant:
ETHICON, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Johnson & Johnson, et al v. Allbritton, et al
as 13-0
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SARAH RUTH ALLBRITTON, WARREN BELL, EVELYN BROWNLEE and others
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON and ETHICON, INC.
Johnson & Johnson, et al v. Allbritton, et al
as 13-615
Petitioner:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON and ETHICON, INC.
Respondent:
SARAH RUTH ALLBRITTON, MISTY DE GROAT, EVELYN BROWNLEE and others
Allbritton et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 5:2013cv00838
Plaintiff:
Sarah Ruth Allbritton , Misty De Groat , Evelyn Brownlee and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Allbritton et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as OKW/5:13-cv-00838
Plaintiff:
Sarah Ruth Allbritton , Misty De Groat , Evelyn Brownlee and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon Inc
Alleman et al v. BP Exploration & Production Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv02003
Defendant:
BP Exploration & Production, Inc., BP America Production Company, BP p.l.c. and others
Plaintiff:
Chad Manieri , Ricardo Martinez , Leon McElveen and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 2701 - Oil Pollution Act
Clay v. State of Georgia et al
as 3:2007cv00062
Plaintiff:
Sandy Clay
Defendant:
State of Georgia, Morgan County and City of Madison, Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv01229
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 pr Complaint for mandamus relief (prisoner)
Clay v. Morgan County
as 1:2007cv01099
Plaintiff:
Sandy Clay
Defendant:
Morgan County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
