Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Kersh v. City of Sanford et al
as 6:2023cv00565
Plaintiff:
Nathan Kersh
Defendant:
City of Sanford, Florida, Officer matthew thornton, City of Sanford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-10002
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2020cv00629
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
City of Sanford, Florida v. Purdue Pharma L.P.., et al
as 1:2019op45599
Defendant:
Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P., Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff:
City of Sanford, Florida
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
City of Sanford, Florida v. Purdue Pharma L.P.., et al
as 6:2019cv01098
Defendant:
McKESSON CORPORATION,, ORTHO-MCNEIL-JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. n/k/a JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.,, ACTAVIS PHARMA, INC. f/k/a WATSON PHARMA, INC., and others
Plaintiff:
City of Sanford, Florida
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Preston Schofield v. James Dekleva, et al
as 14-10898
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PRESTON LEONARD SCHOFIELD
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES DEKLEVA, DONALD ESLINGER, SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA and others
:
SERVICE
Tyrone Hurt v. State of Florida, et al
as 12-2364
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TYRONE HURT
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF FLORIDA, STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF POLICE, et. al., TRAYVON MARTIN'S FAMILY, et. al. and others
McCray v. City of Sanford, Florida
as 6:2010cv01715
Plaintiff:
Robert McCray
Defendant:
City of Sanford, Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2007cv01464
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2007cv00917
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
