Cases 21 - 30 of 1,217
Jehu Bello et al v. Target Corporation et al
as 5:2024cv00167
Plaintiff:
Jehul Bello, Marcus Camacho, Logan Danson and others
Defendant:
Target Corporation, a Minnesota corporation, Target Corporation and Does 1 through 10 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Chomorro-Rodriguez v. Garland
as 24-366
Petitioner:
YUVINI SANTIAGO CHOMORRO-RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Canales v. E.S.P.
as 3:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Santiago Canales
Defendant:
E.S.P.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
(HC)Zamora v. Lynch
as 1:2024cv00040
Petitioner:
Santiago Manuel Zamora
Respondent:
Jeff Lynch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robles Fajardo, et al. v. Garland
as 24-138
Petitioner:
JAVIER ALEXANDER ROBLES FAJARDO, SONIA YAMILETH ALMENDARES AVILA, AARON SANTIAGO ROBLES ALMENDARES and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cruz-Cruz, et al. v. Garland
as 24-136
Petitioner:
ALEJANDRO JOSE CRUZ-CRUZ, SANTIAGO ALEJANDRO CRUZ-HERNANDEZ, MIRNA REBECA HERNANDEZ DE CRUZ and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Martinez-Castillo, et al. v. Garland
as 23-4417
Petitioner:
KATHERINE PAOLA MARTINEZ-CASTILLO, ANGEL SANTIAGO SOLORZANO-MARTINEZ, ANGEL GAEL SOLORZANO-MARTINEZ and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Martinez v. City of Santa Maria, et al.
as 23-4277
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ESTEBAN MARTINEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF SANTA MARIA, PHIL HANSEN, JESUS VALLE, No 19091 and others
Da Silva Vieira, et al. v. Garland
as 23-4065
Petitioner:
RENNAN DA SILVA VIEIRA, YASMIN DIAS FERREIRA and SANTIAGO DIAS DA SILVA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
