Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Santiago v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2022cv11162
Plaintiff:
Yazmin Santiago
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Santiago v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2022cv10360
Plaintiff:
Rigoberto Santiago
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Santiago v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2020cv10266
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Rigoberto Santiago
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Santiago v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2019cv11591
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Yazmin Santiago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Mercado v. Berryhill et al
as 1:2019cv11172
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Nancy A. Berryhill and Andrew M. Saul
Not Yet Classified:
U.S. Attorney Massachusetts and Attorney General USA
Plaintiff:
Santiago Rosario Mercado
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Santiago v. Colvin
as 3:2016cv30161
Plaintiff:
Luis A. Santiago, Sr.
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Santiago v. Colvin
as 1:2015cv10236
Plaintiff:
Jocelyn Santiago
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Santiago v. Colvin
as 3:2014cv30034
Plaintiff:
Luis A. Santiago, Sr.
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Santiago v. Colvin
as 1:2014cv10121
Plaintiff:
Miguel Santiago
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Santiago v. Colvin
as 3:2013cv30120
Plaintiff:
Anna Lydia Santiago
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
