Cases 21 - 30 of 41
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00401
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Starline Windows Inc. et al v. Quanex Building Products Corporation et al
as 3:2015cv01282
Plaintiff:
Vitrum Industries LTD., Starline Architectural Windows LTD. and Starline Windows Inc.
Defendant:
Quanex Building Products Corporation and Truseal Technologies, Inc.
Intervenor:
Bayside Owners Association and Sapphire Tower Owners Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pl
Randall Pittman v. Sapphire Technologies, LP, et al
as 14-56424
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDALL PITTMAN, individually and on behalf of other persons similarly stiuated
Defendant - Appellee:
SAPPHIRE TECHNOLOGIES, LP, FKA Sapphire Technologies, LLC and BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
Sapphire Sales Solutions LLC v. Best Western International Incorporated
as 2:2012cv01538
Defendant:
Best Western International Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Sapphire Sales Solutions LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Grant Casserly v. Randstad US LP et al
as 8:2012cv01023
Defendant:
Accountants International LP, B2B Workforce LP, Clinical One and others
Plaintiff:
Grant Casserly
Joe Hand Promotions Inc v. Jose Manuel Caldera et al
as 2:2012cv03661
Defendant:
Jose Manuel Caldera and Sapphire Lounge LLC
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions Inc
Jason Walters v. Sapphire Technologies Inc et al
as 2:2011cv08144
Defendant:
Randstad Professionals US LP and Sapphire Technologies Inc
Plaintiff:
Jason Walters
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv07107
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv05628
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Grant Casserly v. Randstad US LP et al
as 8:2011cv01018
Defendant:
Accounts International LP, B2B Workforce LP, Clinical One and others
Plaintiff:
Grant Casserly
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
