Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Singh, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2535
Petitioner:
SARBJIT SINGH, NINDER KAUR, KHUSHPREET KAUR and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Singh v. Indian Farmer Express Inc et al
as 1:2023cv09603
Plaintiff:
Sarbjit Singh
Defendant:
Indian Farmer Express Inc and Skyblue Transport Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
SINGH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv30874
Plaintiff:
SARBJIT SINGH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Singh v. Garland
as 23-6074
Petitioner:
SARBJIT SINGH
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Star Insurance Company v. Singh et al
as 1:2022cv07968
Plaintiff:
Star Insurance Company
Cross Defendant:
Inderpal Singh, Sikander Singh and Tejinder Singh
Defendant:
Sarbjit Singh, Harvinder Pal Singh, State Farm Fire & Casualty Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Bastian v. Abrams Gas Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00886
Plaintiff:
Shelley Bastian
Defendant:
Abrams Gas Inc., Velp Gas Inc. and Sarbjit Singh
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
United Specialty Insurance Company v. At-Saf, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv03786
Plaintiff:
United Specialty Insurance Company
Defendant:
At-Saf, Inc., Inderpal Singh, Sikander Singh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Singh v. Garland
as 21-1462
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Petitioner:
SARBJIT SINGH
Sanchez et al v. Sunny & KP Construction Corp et al
as 1:2020cv08649
Defendant:
kuldip Singh, Xinos Construction Corp, Sarbjit Singh and others
Plaintiff:
Francisco Mezquita, Mario Sanchez and Nano Batista
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Singh v. Barr
as 20-2213
Respondent:
William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Petitioner:
Sarbjit Singh
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
