Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Castro v. Correctional Officer Brown et al
as 2:2023cv00763
Plaintiff:
Anthony B Castro
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Brown, Correctional Officer Hattfield, Sargent Finley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Randall v. Bally's Casino CEO and Casino Security et al
as 2:2022cv01190
Defendant:
Calvin, Bally's Casino CEO and Casino Security, Valerie Senatra and others
Plaintiff:
Ryan Kenneth Randall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
NOT USED
as 2:2022cv00187
Plaintiff:
Adolfo Maduena
Defendant:
Matthew Thomas Sargent and JB Hunt Transport Inc.
Maduena v. Sargent et al
as 2:2022cv00188
Plaintiff:
Adolfo Maduena
Defendant:
Matthew Thomas Sargent and JB Hunt Transport Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Whitted v. Nestiorer et al
as 3:2021cv00254
Plaintiff:
Rachel Marie Whitted
Defendant:
Fryer, Haines, Director's and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sargent v. Colvin
as 2:2016cv02149
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Keri A Sargent
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Mayo v. Nevada Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2015cv01906
Defendant:
Adams, Nevada Department of Corrections, Southern Desert Correctional Center and others
Plaintiff:
Arthur Mayo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sargent v. Northland Insurance Company
as 2:2015cv00613
Defendant:
Northland Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Donna Marie Sargent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Cox v. Smith et al
as 3:2011cv00539
Defendant:
Robert B. Bannister, Quentin Byrne, Michael Cruse and others
Plaintiff:
Steve Michael Cox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Doe et al
as 3:2010cv00771
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Sargent John Doe and Correctional Officer John Doe
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
