Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Schmitt et al v. C.R. Bard Inc et al
as 2:2024cv01079
Plaintiff:
Karl Schmitt and Krysstyna Schmitt
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Maye v. Corrections Center of Northeast Ohio, et al.
as 3:2022cv02176
Plaintiff:
Ricco L Maye
Defendant:
Craig Eiden, Masser, Kevin Bloom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maye v. Eiden et al
as 2:2022cv04249
Plaintiff:
Ricco L Maye
Defendant:
Craig Eiden, Masser, Kevin Bloom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schmitt v. Security National Servicing Corporation
as 1:2021cv01188
Plaintiff:
Desiree M. Schmitt
Defendant:
Security National Servicing Corporation doing business as SN Servicing Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Schmitt v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv03608
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Kim Schmitt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schmitt v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2020cv01864
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Brian Schmitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
Miller et al v. City of Cleveland Heights, Ohio et al
as 1:2020cv01348
Defendant:
City of Cleveland Heights, Ohio, Benedict Osowski and Mark Schmitt
Plaintiff:
Christopher Miller, Jr., Christopher Miller, Denazha Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Thompson et al v DeWine et al
as 2:2020cv02129
Plaintiff:
Chad Thompson, Don Keeney and William T. Schmitt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Schmitt et al v. ANJ, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv00493
Defendant:
EML Express, Inc., ANJ LLC, Antonio Nogueira and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis J Schmitt, Diane Schmitt and Dennis J. Schmitt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Schmitt et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv01643
Defendant:
Bard Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Gayle Schmitt and Roger Schmitt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
