Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Detroit Carpenters Fringe Benefit Funds v. Northwest Acoustical, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv10795
Defendant:
Northwest Acoustical, Inc. and Mark A. Schofield
Plaintiff:
Detroit Carpenters Fringe Benefit Funds
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Patton et al v. General Motors LLC et al
as 1:2019cv11332
Plaintiff:
Brenda Linders, Roderick Duhon, Mark Price and others
Defendant:
General Motors LLC, Robert Bosch GmbH and Robert Bosch LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Detroit Carpenters Fringe Benefit Funds v. Northwest Acoustical, Inc., et al
as 2:2017cv10672
Plaintiff:
Detroit Carpenters Fringe Benefit Funds
Defendant:
Northwest Acoustical, Inc. and Mark A. Schofield
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Schofield v. Credit Acceptance Corporation
as 2:2016cv10521
Plaintiff:
James Schofield
Defendant:
Credit Acceptance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Detroit Carpenters Fringe Benefit Funds v. Northwest Acoustical, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv12080
Plaintiff:
Detroit Carpenters Fringe Benefit Funds
Defendant:
Northwest Acoustical, Inc. and Mark A. Schofield
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Detroit Carpenters Fringe Benefit Funds v. Northwest Acoustical, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv15554
Plaintiff:
Detroit Carpenters Fringe Benefit Funds
Defendant:
Northwest Acoustical, Inc., Mark A. Schofield, Eric D. Schofield and others
Brooks v. Butzbaugh et al
as 1:2008cv01170
Plaintiff:
Edwin Brooks
Defendant:
Alfred M. Butzbaugh, Scott Schofield, John E. Dewane and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Brooks v. Butzbaugh et al
as 1:2008cv01121
Petitioner:
Edwin Brooks
Respondent:
Alfred M. Butzbaugh, John E. Dewane, Scott Schofield and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Brann v. Orlans Associates et al
as 1:2008cv00194
Plaintiff:
James Brann
Defendant:
Orlans Associates, Toni Hall, Scott Schofield and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
