Cases 1 - 10 of 849
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00513
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 American With Disabilities Act- Discrimination
Key v. University of Detroit Mercy Law School
as 2:2024cv11198
Plaintiff:
Kelly Royce Key
Defendant:
University of Detroit Mercy Law School
Patsey v. Durand Area Schools et al
as 2:2024cv11172
Plaintiff:
Crystal Patsey
Defendant:
Durand Area Schools and Hi-Tec Building Services
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203 Equal Pay Act
Doe v. University of Detroit Mercy et al
as 2:2024cv11106
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
University of Detroit Mercy and University of Detroit Mercy School of Dentistry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv11074
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Cheeks et al v. Dearborn Heights Police Department et al
as 2:2024cv11010
Plaintiff:
Gerald Cheeks and G'Kylah Cheeks
Defendant:
Dearborn Heights Police Department, Beardon, Dearborn Heights School District 7 and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00368
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00325
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Lemson et al v. Newaygo Public Schools et al
as 1:2024cv00310
Plaintiff:
W.L. and Robert Lemson
Defendant:
Newaygo Public Schools, Ben Gilpin, James Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10760
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
