Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Schroeder v. Gilbert
as 4:2014cv00130
Plaintiff:
Renee Schroeder
Defendant:
Caleb Gilbert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ward v. Lavender et al
as 3:2013cv00133
Plaintiff:
Michael Charles Ward
Defendant:
Robert W. Lavender, Kevin Nolley, Jimmy LeCroy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ward v. Lavender et al
as 1:2013cv02104
Plaintiff:
Michael Charles Ward
Defendant:
Robert W. Lavender, Kevin Nolley, Jimmy LeCroy and others
Schroeder v. Trespalacious
as 4:2012cv00123
Plaintiff:
William R. Schroeder
Defendant:
Jose A. Trespalacious
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
The Independence Institute et al v. Gessler
as 1:2011mi00126
Plaintiff:
The Independence Institute, Jon Caldara, Jessica Corry and others
Defendant:
Scott Gessler
Schroeder v. Financial Credit Service, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00063
Plaintiff:
Stephen Schroeder
Defendant:
Financial Credit Service, Inc. and Bruce Cohen
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jones v. The Shaw Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv02775
Plaintiff:
Donald G. Jones
Defendant:
The Shaw Group, Inc., LA. Land Trust, K/B Home-Shaw of Louisiana LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Type:
Other Statutes
Jones v. The Shaw Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2009mi00385
Plaintiff:
Donald G. Jones
Defendant:
The Shaw Group, Inc., LA. Land Trust, K/B Home-Shaw of Louisiana LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Type:
Other Statutes
Jones v. Clay County Sheriff's Department et al
as 4:2008cv00130
Plaintiff:
Daniel Bruce Jones
Defendant:
Clay County Sheriff's Department, Roger Shivers, Larry Schroeder and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Dougherty+Design Group, Inc. v. Schroeder et al
as 1:2007cv01211
Plaintiff:
Dougherty+Design Group, Inc.
Defendant:
David E. Schroeder, David E. Schroeder, Schroeder Slater, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
