Cases 1 - 10 of 12
STEPHANY v. THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2019cv03140
Plaintiff:
NAPOLEON STEPHANY
Defendant:
THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PSYCHOLOGY STAFF and SCI CAMPHILL MEDICAL STAFF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SANCHEZ v. SCI-CAMPHILL
as 4:2018cv02110
Plaintiff:
Vincent J. Sanchez
Defendant:
Sci-Camphill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SANCHEZ v. SCI-CAMPHILL
as 2:2018cv04129
Plaintiff:
VINCENT J. SANCHEZ
Defendant:
SCI-CAMPHILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. SCI Camphill et al
as 1:2018cv01534
Plaintiff:
Edvis Earl Henderson
Defendant:
SCI Rockview and SCI Camphill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOYE v. SCI CAMPHILL PRISON et al
as 3:2017cv00728
Plaintiff:
NATHAN HOYE
Defendant:
SCI CAMPHILL PRISON, SCI HUNTNDON PRISON MEDICAL STAFF and Boal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOYE v. SCI CAMPHILL PRISON et al
as 2:2017cv00219
Plaintiff:
NATHAN HOYE
Defendant:
SCI CAMPHILL PRISON, SCI HUNTNDON PRISON MEDICAL STAFF and BOAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
ALLEN v. SCI CAMPHILL et al
as 2:2014cv04459
Petitioner:
GORDEN ALLEN
Respondent:
SCI CAMPHILL, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ____________, LAUREL E. HARRY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PORTALATIN v. WARDEN SCI CAMPHILL et al
as 5:2014cv03011
Petitioner:
JORGE L. PORTALATIN
Respondent:
WARDEN SCI CAMPHILL and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Portalatin v. Warden SCI Camphill et al
as 3:2014cv00394
Petitioner:
Jorge L. Portalatin
Respondent:
Warden SCI Camphill and Attorney General of PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GUERRA v. SCI GRATERFORD et al
as 2:2013cv06422
Plaintiff:
HUMBERTO CRUZ GUERRA
Defendant:
SCI GRATERFORD, SCI CAMPHILL, SCI BENNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
