Cases 1 - 10 of 54
ROSS v. MCCORMACK et al
as 1:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
KEVIN LEE ROSS
Defendant:
ANDREW MCCORMACK, MJ MCFADDEN, SCOTT KELLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ROSS v. MCCORMACK et al
as 1:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
KEVIN LEE ROSS
Defendant:
ANDREW MCCORMACK, BRYCE TURGENSON, SCOTT LEE ROSS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JOHNSON v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2023cv00331
Plaintiff:
ROBERT W JOHNSON
Defendant:
DONALD J TRUMP, FACEBOOK, META and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
CANTRELL v. BRUNSWICK MAINE POLICE et al
as 2:2023cv00283
Plaintiff:
BRICE CANTRELL
Defendant:
BRUNSWICK MAINE POLICE, TOWN OF BRUNSWICK, SCOTT STEWART and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00276
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00116
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00074
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
POOLE v. HANCOCK COUNTY et al
as 1:2022cv00364
Plaintiff:
DOROTHY POOLE
Defendant:
HANCOCK COUNTY, SCOTT KANE, TIMOTHY RICHARDSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MASCAL v. MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2022cv00292
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER MASCAL
Defendant:
MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, LONG CREEK YOUTH DEVELOPMENT CENTER, JOSEPH PONTE and others
Not Classified By Court:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - PRISONER CASES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROUSSEL v. MAYO et al
as 1:2022cv00285
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH F ROUSSEL
Defendant:
WILLIAM MAYO, SCOTT WILCOX, RYAN BAILEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
