Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Cases 1 - 10 of 955
Mensen v. CR Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02139
Plaintiff: Scott Mensen
Defendant: CR Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Isham v. Richardson et al
as 3:2024cv00142
Plaintiff: Ralph E. Isham
Defendant: Chief Craig Richardson, Sergeant Kenneth Lloyd, Scott Kinderdine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02119
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Sprague v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02098
Plaintiff: Robert Scott Sprague
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Scott v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01949
Plaintiff: Tennesa Scott
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01752
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Scott v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01736
Plaintiff: Vickey Scott
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Noel v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01387
Plaintiff: Scott Noel
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Scott v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01303
Plaintiff: Emma Scott
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Solly v. Hoying et al
as 2:2024cv01249
Plaintiff: Gregory L. Solly
Defendant: Lisa Hoying, Annette Chambers-Smith, Glenn Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?