Civil Rights Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Helen Le v. USPS, et al
as 23-15816
Plaintiff / Appellant: HELEN LE
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, CEO, Director, Supervisor and SCOTT S. HARRIS, Clerk at Supreme Court of US
James Miller v. Scott Harris
as 23-55371
Plaintiff / Appellant: JAMES L. MILLER
Defendant / Appellee: SCOTT S. HARRIS, Individual and Official Capacity
James L. Miller v. Scott S. Harris et al
as 2:2023cv01223
Plaintiff: James L. Miller
Defendant: Scott S. Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Yi Shao v. John Roberts, Jr., et al
as 22-15857
Plaintiff / Appellant: YI TAI SHAO, AKA Linda Yi Tai Shao
Defendant / Appellee: JOHN G. ROBERTS, Jr., ANTHONY M. KENNEDY, STEPHEN G. BREYER and others
(PS) Shao v. Roberts, et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00325
Plaintiff: Yi Tai Shao and Linda Shao
Defendant: John G. Roberts, Jr., Anthony M. Kennedy, Stephen Breyer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
v. SHAO et al
as 2:2022at00196
Defendant: Yi Tai SHAO, John G. Roberts, Jr., Anthony M Kennedy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Adam Bereki v. Scott S. Harris
as 8:2021cv01582
Plaintiff: Adam Bereki
Defendant: Scott S. Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James L. Miller v. Scott S. Harris et al
as 2:2019cv08910
Plaintiff: James L. Miller
Defendant: Scott S. Harris and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv01838
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Glenn Winningham v. Donald Baker, et al
as 17-15243
Plaintiff - Appellant: GLENN WINNINGHAM
Defendant - Appellee: DONALD BAKER, Deputy Clerk, DONALD B. VERILLI, Jr., Wrongdoer; US Solicitor General, ERIK FOSSUM, Wrongdoer; Deputy Clerk and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?