Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Dyer v. U.S. Supreme Court et al
as 3:2024cv00493
Plaintiff:
Jewel Dyer
Defendant:
U.S. Supreme Court, Scott S. Harris and Sara Simmons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01417
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Federal Trade Commission v. Noland et al
as 4:2020mc80015
Defendant:
James D Noland, Jr, Kimberly Friday, Success By Media LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Al-Pine v. Harris et al
as 3:2018cv03128
Plaintiff:
Charles Al-Pine
Defendant:
Scott S. Harris and Kendall Richerson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Al-Pine v. Harris et al
as 3:2018cv03055
Plaintiff:
Charles Al-Pine
Defendant:
Scott S. Harris and Kendall Richerson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv05242
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DeWitt v. Ryan et al
as 4:2015cv05261
Plaintiff:
Timothy A. DeWitt
Defendant:
Paul Ryan, California Citizens Redistricting Commission, Alex Padilla and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jamar v. Golden West Savings et al
as 4:2011cv02562
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jamar
Defendant:
Golden West Savings, World Savings, Financial Title Company and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Illinois Computer Research, LLC v. Fish & Richardson P.C.
as 5:2008mc80075
Plaintiff:
Illinois Computer Research, LLC
Defendant:
Fish & Richardson P.C.
3rd Party Defendant:
Scott C. Harris
3rd Party Plaintiff:
Fish & Richardson P.C.
Movant:
Cisco Systems Inc. and Richard Frenkel
Illinois Computer Research, LLC v. Fish & Richardson P.C.
as 5:2008mc80074
Plaintiff:
Illinois Computer Research, LLC, Illinois Computer Research, LLC, Illinois Computer Research, LLC and others
Defendant:
Fish & Richardson P.C.
3rd Party Defendant:
Scott C. Harris and Fish & Richardson P.C.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
