Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Whittington v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 3:2019cv05487
Defendant:
Steve Dyson, Brad Marler and Internal Revenue Service
Plaintiff:
Scott A Whittington
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
Whittington v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 1:2019cv00621
Plaintiff:
Scott H Whittington
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Seismic Support Services, LLC, et al v. CIR
as 14-72813
Petitioner - Appellant:
SEISMIC SUPPORT SERVICES, LLC and SCOTT A. WHITTINGTON, A Tax Matters Partner
Respondent - Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Seismic Support Services, LLC, et al v. CIR
as 14-72814
Petitioner - Appellant:
SEISMIC SUPPORT SERVICES, LLC and SCOTT A. WHITTINGTON, A Tax Matters Partner
Respondent - Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Whittington v. UNITED STATES
as 3:2014cv05117
Plaintiff:
Scott A Whittington
Defendant:
UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Whittington v. United States Government et al
as 3:2013cv05274
Plaintiff:
Scott A Whittington
Defendant:
United States Government, Internal Revenue Service, Daniel Erickson and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Whittington v. United States Government et al
as 3:2013cv05223
Plaintiff:
Scott A Whittington
Defendant:
United States Government, Internal Revenue Service, Daniel Erickson and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Whittington v. United States Government et al
as 3:2013cv05224
Plaintiff:
Scott A Whittington
Defendant:
United States Government, Internal Revenue Service, Daniel Erickson and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609 IRS: Petition to Quash IRS Summons
Whittington v. United States Government et al
as 3:2013cv05162
Plaintiff:
Scott A Whittington
Defendant:
United States Government, Internal Revenue Service, Daniel Erickson and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609 IRS: Petition to Quash IRS Summons
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
