Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Bolton v. Lucent Technologies Corp et al
as 2:2017cv00752
Plaintiff:
Scott Carroll Bolton
Defendant:
Lucent Technologies Corp, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bolton v. King County Corrections et al
as 2:2017cv00388
Plaintiff:
Scott Carroll Bolton
Defendant:
King County Corrections, John Doe and Director of King County Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bolton v. Lucent Technologies Corp
as 2:2015cv00577
Plaintiff:
Scott Carroll Bolton
Defendant:
Lucent Technologies Corp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bolton v. State of Washington et al
as 3:2013cv05639
Plaintiff:
Scott Carroll Bolton
Defendant:
State of Washington, CEO of Lucent Technologies, Director of Lucent Technologies and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bolton v. State of Washington et al
as 2:2012cv01306
Plaintiff:
Scott Carroll Bolton
Defendant:
State of Washington and King County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bolton v. Washington Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2012cv05677
Plaintiff:
Scott Carroll Bolton
Defendant:
Washington Department of Corrections, Washington State and Washington Correction Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bolton v. State of Washington et al
as 3:2012cv05658
Plaintiff:
Scott Carroll Bolton
Defendant:
State of Washington, Department of Corrections, Olympic Corrections Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bolton v. Washington State et al
as 2:2012cv01234
Plaintiff:
Scott Carroll Bolton
Defendant:
Washington State, Michael Hayden, Hedi Jacobsen Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv01648
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Bolton v. State of Washington
as 2:2011cv01152
Petitioner:
Scott Carroll Bolton
Respondent:
State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
