Cases 1 - 10 of 304
Perinparasa v. Barr et al
as 1:2020cv00664
Defendant:
Scott Hassell, Neilson, Matthew Whitaker and others
Plaintiff:
Thambymuththu Perinparasa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mithushan v. Barr et al
as 1:2020cv00602
Defendant:
Scott Hassell, Secretary of Homeland Security, Matthew Whitaker and others
Plaintiff:
Pathmakumar Mithushan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Singh v. Barr et al
as 1:2020cv00567
Defendant:
Scott Hassell, Secretary of Homeland Security, Matthew Whitaker and others
Plaintiff:
Surjit Singh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Singh v. Secretary of Homeland Security et al
as 4:2019cv00270
Respondent:
Scott Hassell, Attorney General of the United States, Jonathon Horton and others
Petitioner:
Gurnam Singh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Weldegabr v. United States Attorney General et al
as 4:2019cv00130
Petitioner:
Abel Okbay Weldegabr
Respondent:
Scott Hassell, United States Attorney General, Department of Homeland Security and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Roberson v. Hassell
as 4:2018cv01532
Petitioner:
Mark Edward Roberson
Defendant:
Scott . Hassell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Van v. Nielsen et al
as 4:2018cv00617
Petitioner:
Le Cho Van
Respondent:
Kirstjen Nielsen, Jeffrey B Sessions, III, Thomas D Homan and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 3
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Moore v. Entrekin et al
as 4:2018cv00224
Plaintiff:
Corion Leshon Moore
Defendant:
Todd Entrekin, Scott Hassell, Keith Peek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Islam v. Gartland et al
as 4:2018cv00087
Petitioner:
Noor Islam
Respondent:
Scott Hassel
Defendant:
Jeff Sessions
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Corion Moore v. Todd Entrekin, et al
as 17-15304
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CORION LESHON MOORE
Defendant - Appellee:
TODD ENTREKIN, Sheriff, SCOTT HASSELL, Chief, N. EXFORD, Deputy and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
