Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Rhodes v. Highland, Charter Township of et al
as 2:2023cv10964
Plaintiff:
Scott M. Rhodes
Defendant:
Highland, Charter Township of, Oakland County Sheriff, Craig Vradenburg and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00685
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
The Moore Family Trust et al v. Bingham et al
as 2:2019cv00115
Plaintiff:
The Moore Family Trust and Scott M. Moore
Defendant:
William David Bingham, Peter Edward Bingham and Michael William Bingham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv13805
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lang v. Weltman, Weinberg & Reis Co., L.P.A.
as 1:2015cv01024
Plaintiff:
Scott M. Lang
Defendant:
Weltman, Weinberg & Reis Co., L.P.A.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Bennetts v. AT&T Integrated Disability Service Center
as 1:2015cv10087
Plaintiff:
Scott M. Bennetts
Defendant:
AT&T Integrated Disability Service Center
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv13629
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Bennetts v. AT&T Integrated Disability Service Center et al
as 1:2012cv14640
Plaintiff:
Scott M. Bennetts
Defendant:
AT&T Integrated Disability Service Center and AT&T Umbrella Plan No. 1
Sherlund v. Caledonia, Village of et al
as 1:2012cv01106
Plaintiff:
Scott M. Sherlund
Defendant:
Caledonia, Village of , Glenn Gilbert , Karen Hahn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Civil Rights
Wire Harness - End-Payor Actions
as W:2012cv00103
Plaintiff:
Susan Lacava , Meredith Heller , Halley Ascher and others
Defendant:
Furukawa Electric Company, Limited , Lear Corporation , Leoni AG and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
