Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00422
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Gilman v. Intel Corporation
as 3:2018cv00193
Plaintiff:
Scott M. Gilman
Defendant:
Intel Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 cl Class Action Fairness Action - 2005
Myers v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 3:2017cv00819
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Scott M. Myers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of Commissioner's Final Decision
Scott M. O'Halloran
as 3:2017ad00112
In Re:
Scott M. O'Halloran
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 Cause Code Unknown
Jones v. Nooth
as 2:2016cv01021
Petitioner:
Scott M. Jones
Unknown:
Lisa Hay
Respondent:
Mark Nooth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reagle v. Marion County et al
as 6:2015cv00855
Defendant:
Marion County, Marion County Jail and Marion County Jail Staff
Plaintiff:
Scott M. Reagle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. U.S. Department of Justice et al
as 3:2011cv00203
Defendant:
Scott M. Kerins, David Smith, David Tyree and others
Plaintiff:
Kaysam Kent Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Polygon Northwest Company LLC v. Aon Risk Insurance Services West, Inc.
as 3:2011cv00072
Defendant:
Aon Risk Insurance Services West, Inc.
206) 623-9273 (fax:
Scott M. Stickney
Plaintiff:
Polygon Northwest Company LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2008cv00758
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
McCoy v. Principal Residential Mortgage et al
as 3:2008cv00036
Plaintiff:
Margo McCoy
Defendant:
Principal Residential Mortgage, S & K Creative Solutions and Scott M. Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
