Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Talley v. Harry et al
as 1:2023cv01033
Plaintiff:
Quintez Talley
Defendant:
Dr. Laurel Harry, MHM, Inc., Pennsylvania Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JAMES v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv00786
Defendant:
JOHN DOE #5, LOIS ALLEN, MARK CAPPOZZA and others
Plaintiff:
PARIS L. JAMES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
TALLEY v. MOORE et al
as 2:2021cv00298
Defendant:
ROBERT MCSURDY, PETER C. SAAVEDRA, TRAVIS NAPP and others
Plaintiff:
QUINTEZ TALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
SATTERFIELD v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2019cv00872
Plaintiff:
PAUL SATTERFIELD
Defendant:
LT. NEWMAN, CAPTAIN ROBERT HAWKINBERRY, CAPTAIN WESLEY TIFT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
TALLEY v. PA. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2019cv00308
Defendant:
LT. COLLINS, DORINA VARNER, GOVENOR TOM WOLFE and others
Plaintiff:
QUINTEZ TALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Nieves v. Capoza et al
as 3:2019cv00183
Plaintiff:
Luis Nieves
Defendant:
Mark Capoza, Scott Nickelson and Lt. Collens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARRIS v. POSKA et al
as 2:2015cv01493
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HARRIS
Defendant:
POSKA, C. PARKER, BRIAN COLEMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EVERETT v. PIERCE et al
as 2:2015cv01383
Plaintiff:
JEVON A. EVERETT
Defendant:
PIERCE, BRIAN COLEMAN, ASHMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
VELAZQUEZ v. NICKELSON et al
as 5:2015cv05177
Petitioner:
ANTHONY VELAZQUEZ
Respondent:
SCOTT NICKELSON, THE DISTRICT COURT OF LANCASTER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SOMBERGER v. NICKELSON et al
as 2:2015cv04978
Petitioner:
TYRON SOMBERGER
Respondent:
SCOTT NICKELSON, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
