Cases 31 - 40 of 101
McCray v. Frakes
as 8:2021cv00007
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Respondent:
State of Nebraska and Scott R. Frakes
Petitioner:
Samuel McCray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Walt v. Frakes et al
as 8:2020cv00493
Petitioner:
Kevin John Walt
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Respondent:
Scott R. Frakes and Michele Wilhelm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jason Assad v. Todd Wasmer, et al
as 20-3448
Respondent / Appellee:
Todd Wasmer, Warden Tecumseh Correctional Institution and Scott R. Frakes, Director of the Nebraska Department of Correctional Services
Petitioner / Appellant:
Jason Assad
Rodrigo Ortega v. Scott Frakes
as 20-3407
Petitioner / Appellant:
Rodrigo A. Ortega
Respondent / Appellee:
Scott R. Frakes
Kyle McDonald v. Scott Frakes
as 20-3291
Petitioner / Appellant:
Kyle J. McDonald
Respondent / Appellee:
Scott R. Frakes
Respondent:
State of Nebraska
Abram v. Nebraska Department of Correctional Services et al
as 8:2020cv00437
Defendant:
Scott R. Frakes, Nebraska Department of Correctional Services, Don Kleine and others
Plaintiff:
RayShawn Abram
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cody Strodtman v. Scott Frakes
as 20-2882
Respondent:
Brad Hansen
Petitioner / Appellant:
Cody Strodtman
Respondent / Appellee:
Scott R. Frakes, Director of the Nebraska Department of Correctional Services
Mitchell Bogenreif v. Scott Frakes, et al
as 20-2741
Respondent / Appellee:
Department of Correctional Services, Scott R. Frakes, Director and State of Nebraska
Petitioner / Appellant:
Mitchell L. Bogenreif
Assad v. Wasmer et al
as 4:2020cv03070
Petitioner:
Jason Assad
Respondent:
Scott R. Frakes
Defendant:
Todd Wasmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ortega v. Frakes
as 8:2020cv00209
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Respondent:
Scott R. Frakes
Petitioner:
Rodrigo A. Ortega
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
