Cases 41 - 50 of 64
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv03508
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
WILLIS et al v. SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO.
as 2:2011cv00747
Plaintiff:
BARBARA WILLIS and ROBERT BRADFORD
Defendant:
SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MANZO et al v. SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO
as 5:2010cv06114
Plaintiff:
CAROL MANZO and THOMAS MANZO, JR.
Defendant:
SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ERIE INSURANCE EXCHANGE v. DANBY PRODUCTS, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv01271
Plaintiff:
ERIE INSURANCE EXCHANGE
Defendant:
DANBY PRODUCTS, INC., SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO. , SEARS HOLDINGS CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COLLIER v. SEARS ROEBUCK AND CO.
as 2:2010cv04477
Plaintiff:
EDITH COLLIER
Defendant:
SEARS ROEBUCK AND CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SCHALL et al v. SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO.
as 1:2010cv00208
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP SCHALL and VICTORIA SCHALL
Defendant:
SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CHEREPKO v. SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO.
as 2:2010cv00892
Plaintiff:
EDWARD CHEREPKO
Defendant:
SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SCULLY CAVANAGH et al v. ELECTROLUX HOME PRODUCTS et al
as 2:2010cv02890
Plaintiff:
ROSEANNE SCULLY and CHARLES M. CAVANAGH
Defendant:
ELECTROLUX HOME PRODUCTS and SEARS ROEBUCK AND CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
PENDERGAST v. AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv68061
Defendant:
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC., AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION, BONDEX INTERNATIONAL, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
LINDA L PENDERGAST
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
BULLION v. J.C. PENNEY COMPANY, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv67424
Plaintiff:
ROBERT P. BULLION
Defendant:
J.C. PENNEY COMPANY, INC. , ANDIS COMPANY , CONAIR CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
