Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Eric Call v. Woodrow Jones III
as 21-1334
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN FROSH, in his official capacity as Attorney General of Maryland and WOODROW W. JONES, III, in his official capacity as Secretary of State Police
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERIC CALL, an individual and resident of Anne Arundel County, KYLE HARRISON, an individual and resident of Calvert County, CITIZENS COMMITTEE FOR THE RIGHT TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS and others
Dominic Bianchi v. Brian Frosh
as 21-1255
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FIELD TRADERS LLC, A resident of Anne Arundel County, DOMINIC BIANCHI, an individual and resident of Baltimore County, DAVID SNOPE, an individual and resident of Baltimore County and others
Defendant / Appellee:
JIM FREDERICKS, in his official capacity as Sheriff of Anne Arundel County, Maryland, R. JAY FISHER, in his official capacity as Sheriff of Baltimore County, Maryland, COL. WOODROW W. JONES, III, in his official capacity as Secretary of State Police of Maryland and others
Raymond Woollard v. Denis Gallagher
as 12-1437
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA, STATE OF MICHIGAN, VIRGINIA CITIZENS DEFENSE LEAGUE, INC. and others
Defendant / Appellant:
MARCUS L. BROWN, DENIS GALLAGHER, CHARLES M. THOMAS, JR. and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
RAYMOND WOOLLARD and SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION, INC.
Defendant:
TERRENCE SHERIDAN
Raymond Woollard v. Denis Gallagher
as 12-1437
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RAYMOND WOOLLARD and SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION, INC.
Defendant - Appellant:
TERRENCE SHERIDAN, DENIS GALLAGHER, SEYMOUR GOLDSTEIN and others
Michelle Lane v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 11-1847
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHELLE LANE, SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION, INC., MATTHEW WELLING and others
Defendant - Appellee:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General of the United States, W. STEVEN FLAHERTY, Superintendent, Virginia State Police and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
