Cases 1 - 10 of 21,634
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21731
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551 Administrative Procedure Act
Babecki v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Martin County)
as 2:2024cv14137
Plaintiff:
Anthony R. Babecki
Respondent:
Secretary Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00732
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Johnson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Pinellas County)
as 8:2024cv01059
Petitioner:
John Fitzgerald Johnson
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
George Steen v. Todd Ishee
as 24-6409
Petitioner:
GEORGE MICHAEL STEEN
Respondent:
TODD E. ISHEE, Secretary of the Department of Adult Correction and BRETT BULLIS, Warden of Avery-Mitchell CI
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21698
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21692
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551 Administrative Procedure Act
Sindaco v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Volusia)
as 3:2024cv00429
Petitioner:
Robert E Sindaco
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gernard Hart v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-11369
Petitioner:
GERNARD HART
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21656
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
