Cases 31 - 40 of 108
Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Alert Security LLC et al
as 2:2019cv01241
Defendant:
Alert Security LLC, Marek Salamon, Alert Services LLC and others
Plaintiff:
R Alexander Acosta and Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
R. Acosta v. Austin Electric Services, LLC, et al
as 18-16581
Plaintiff - Appellee:
R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor
Defendant - Appellant:
AUSTIN ELECTRIC SERVICES, LLC, a limited liability corporation and TOBY THOMAS, an individual
Acosta v. Kizzang LLC et al
as 2:2018cv01559
Defendant:
Tom Lee, Robert Alexander, Kizzang LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Secretary of Labor R. Alexander Acosta and R. Alexander Acosta
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109
R. Acosta v. Employer Solutions Staffing Gr, et al
as 18-16493
Plaintiff - Appellee:
R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA, Secretary of Labor, U.S. Department of Labor
Defendant - Appellant:
EMPLOYER SOLUTIONS STAFFING GROUP, LLC, a limited liability company, EMPLOYER SOLUTIONS STAFFING GROUP II , LLC, a limited liability company, EMPLOYER SOLUTIONS STAFFING GROUP III, LLC, a limited liability company and others
Glenn Tibble, et al v. Edison International, et al
as 18-55974
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GLENN TIBBLE, as representative of a class of similarly situated persons, and on behalf of the Plan, WILLIAM BAUER, as representative of a class of similarly situated persons, and on behalf of the Plan, WILLIAM IZRAL, as representative of a class of similarly situated persons, and on behalf of the Plan and others
Appellant:
SCHLICHTER BOGARD & DENTON LLP, Class Counsel and Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs
Defendant - Appellee:
EDISON INTERNATIONAL, EDISON INTERNATIONAL BENEFITS COMMITTEE, FKA Southern California Edison Benefits Committee, EDISON INTERNATIONAL TRUST INVESTMENT COMMITTEE and others
Acosta v. Local 872, Laborers International Union of North America
as 2:2018cv01185
Petitioner:
Secretary of Labor R. Alexander Acosta
Respondent:
Local 872, Laborers International Union of North America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0401
Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association et al v. Chiang et al
as 2:2018at00977
Plaintiff:
Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association , Jonathan M. Coupal and Debra A. Desrosiers
Defendant:
John Chiang and The California Secure Choice Retirement Savings Program
Intervenor_defendant:
U.S. Secretary of Labor
Intervenor:
U.S. Secretary of the Treasury
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Acosta v. Vision Airlines, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00682
Defendant:
William Acor, Shelley Lynne, Vision Airlines, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Secretary of Labor R. Alexander Acosta
Unknown:
Susan Seletsky
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Board of Trustees of the Apartment Employees Pension Fund et al v. R. Alexander Acosta, in his official capacity as Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor et al
as 3:2018cv02177
Petitioner:
Board of Trustees of the Apartment Employees Pension Fund , Edward R. Lenhart, in his capacity as Chairman of the Board of Trustees of the Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust and Chuck Mack, individually and in his capacity as Co-Chairman/Secretary of the Board of Trustees of the Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust
Respondent:
R. Alexander Acosta, in his official capacity as Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor and Klaus Placke, in his official capacity as Acting Regional Director, United States Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Arvind Gupta v. Wipro Limited, et al
as 18-15008
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARVIND GUPTA
Defendant - Appellee:
WIPRO LIMITED, AZIM HASHIM PREMJI, President of Wipro, in his personal and official capacity and SECRETARY OF UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
