Cases 31 - 40 of 44
MacKay v. Crew
as 12-5039
Plaintiff:
Reform Party of the United States of America, RPUSA
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellant:
John Blare, RPUSA Secretary & RPUSA RPCA National Committee Member & Reform Party of California Chair
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant:
Frank MacKay, Independence Party of New York,, IPNY and Michael K. Zumbluskas, RPUSA IPNY National Committee Member & RPUSA Legal Committee Chair
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellee:
Beverly Bev Kennedy
Defendant:
Karan Kumar Kalotee
Defendant - Appellee:
Kay Allison Crews, Charles Foster, David Collison and others
Katherine Graddy v. U.S. Dept of Homeland Security, et al
as 12-3571
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Katherine Sue Graddy
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Department of Homeland Security, (DHS), Janet Napolitano, in her Official Capacity as Director of Homeland Security, Michael Chertoff, in his Official Capacity as The Former Director of Homeland Security and others
Cornell Cornish v. Jon Dudas, et al
as 11-5278
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Cornell D.M. Judge Cornish
Defendant - Appellee:
Jon Dudas, in his Official Capacity as Under-Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Harry I. Moatz, in his Official Capacity as Director, Office of Enrollment and Discipline , U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and others
Messier v. NFL Properties, LLC
as 11-2180
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michel Joseph Messier
Defendant - Appellee:
NFL Properties, LLC, New Orleans Louisiana Saints, L.L.C., The Secretary of State of Louisiana and others
Messier v. NFL Properties, LLC et al
as 1:2010cv01075
Plaintiff:
Michel Joseph Messier
Defendant:
NFL Properties, LLC, New Orleans Louisiana Saints, L.L.C., The Secretary of State of Louisiana and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
Delano Farms Company, et al v. The California Table Grape Com, et al
as 10-16906
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DELANO FARMS COMPANY, FOUR STAR FRUIT, INC. and GERAWAN FARMING, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
THE CALIFORNIA TABLE GRAPE COMMISSION, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE and others
Who Dat?, Inc. v. New Orleans Louisiana Saints, L.L.C. et al
as 2:2010cv02296
Defendant:
New Orleans Louisiana Saints, L.L.C. , NFL Properties, LLC , Secretary of State of Louisiana and others
Counter_claimant:
NFL Properties, LLC , New Orleans Louisiana Saints, L.L.C. and National Football League
Plaintiff:
Who Dat, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Who Dat, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
Cornell Cornish v. David Kappos, et al
as 10-5236
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Cornell D.M. Judge Cornish
Defendant - Appellee:
David J. Kappos, in his Official Capacity as Under-Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Harry I. Moatz, in his Official Capacity as Director, Office of Enrollment and Discipline , U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and others
Cornell Cornish v. David Kappos, et al
as 10-5223
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Cornell D.M. Judge Cornish
Defendant - Appellee:
David J. Kappos, in his Official Capacity as Under-Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Harry I. Moatz, in his Official Capacity as Director, Office of Enrollment and Discipline , U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and others
Cornell Cornish v. Jon Dudas, et al
as 10-5096
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Cornell D.M. Judge Cornish
Defendant - Appellee:
Jon Dudas, in his Official Capacity as Under-Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Harry I. Moatz, in his Official Capacity as Director, Office of Enrollment and Discipline , U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
