Cases 81 - 90 of 56,347
Rhodes v. Ford
as 24-3106
Plaintiff:
KAVIN MAURICE RHODES
Defendant:
D. FORD, LTA, D. LUNSFORD, SSA, K. ROYAL and others
Timothy Abney v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 24-11554
Petitioner:
TIMOTHY KYLE ABNEY
Respondent:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Joe Martinez v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 24-11555
Petitioner:
JOE MARTINEZ
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
OMWEGA v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00752
Petitioner:
ROSELYNE OMWEGA
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
MOSELEY v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00754
Petitioner:
ROBERT MOSELEY
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
TROEN v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00757
Petitioner:
KATHY L. TROEN
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
OSMANI v. GARLAND et al
as 2:2024cv06114
Plaintiff:
ILIR OSMANI
Defendant:
Attorney General MERRICK GARLAND, SECRETARY ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Ur Jaddou and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
King v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 3:2024cv00486
Petitioner:
Darrell Glenn King
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv02916
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Rabold v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Brevard County)
as 6:2024cv00907
Petitioner:
Joshua-Wayne Rabold
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
