Cases
K.C., et al v. Individual Members of the Medical Licensing Board, et al
as 23-2366
Plaintiff / Appellee: K.C., NATHANIEL CLAWSON, BETH CLAWSON and others
Defendant / Appellant: INDIVIDUAL MEMBERS OF THE MEDICAL LICENSING BOARD OF INDIANA, LINDSAY HYER, Executive Director, Indiana Professional Licensing Agency, TODD ROKITA, Attorney General of the State of Indiana and others
Amicus Curiae: FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL, ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM, STATE OF ALABAMA and others
K.C. v. THE INDIVIDUAL MEMBERS OF THE MEDICAL LICENSING BOARD OF INDIANA, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00595
Plaintiff: K. C., NATHANIEL CLAWSON, BETH CLAWSON and others
Defendant: THE INDIVIDUAL MEMBERS OF THE MEDICAL LICENSING BOARD OF INDIANA, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, INDIANA PROFESSIONAL LICENSING AGENCY, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF INDIANA and others
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF ARKANSAS, State of Alabama, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Interested Party: GENDERNEXUS, INC. and GENDER EXPANSIVE KIDS & COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
INDIANA PROTECTION AND ADVOCACY SERVICES COMMISSION v. INDIANA FAMILY AND SOCIAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00906
Plaintiff: INDIANA PROTECTION AND ADVOCACY SERVICES COMMISSION
Defendant: INDIANA FAMILY AND SOCIAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, DIVISION OF MENTAL HEALTH AND ADDICTION, SECRETARY, INDIANA FAMILY AND SOCIAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp Civil Rights - Denial of Due Process
Moore v. Secretary Indiana Family and Social Services Administration et al
as 3:2016cv00227
Plaintiff: Shelly Moore
Defendant: Secretary Indiana Family and Social Services Administration, Indiana Family and Social Service Administration and Advantage Health Solutions Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?