Cases 1 - 9 of 9
DOE et al v. AUSTIN et al
as 3:2021cv01211
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE, I, JOHN 2 DOE, JOHN DOE #3 and others
Defendant:
Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin, III, Secretary U.S. DHS Xavier Becerra, Secretary Air Force Frank Kendall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00637
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dorsey v. Intelligence Community et al
as 6:2018cv01349
Defendant:
Bill Gates, Administrator and Secretary of Defense, Intelligence Community and others
Plaintiff:
Sherman Dorsey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Juste v. FBI Resident Agency et al
as 1:2016cv23430
Plaintiff:
Andre Juste
Defendant:
FBI Resident Agency , FBI Pittsburg Corporation , Federal Bureau of Investigation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2016cv00097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791
DEMOS v. PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al
as 1:2013cv00013
Petitioner:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS
Respondent:
PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and US SECRETARY OF DEFENSE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Demos v. U.S. Secretary of Defense et al
as 1:2012cv24531
Plaintiff:
John R. Demos
Defendant:
U.S. Secretary of Defense and Attorney General of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Robinson et al v. Secretary of Defense
as 1:2007cv23302
Plaintiff:
Sharita Robinson and Sharita Robinson
Defendant:
Edgar Jose Morales and Secretary of Defense
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Rivera v. Reid et al
as 1:2007cv22907
Plaintiff:
Vincent F. Rivera
Defendant:
Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, Alcee L. Hastings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
