Cases 81 - 90 of 249
Mikhmanov v. Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 6:2021cv00214
Defendant:
Acting Director Tracy Renaud, Acting Secretary David P Pekoske, Acting Director, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Plaintiff:
Dilshod Mikhmanov
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 0702
Lawrence Niskey v. Alejandro Mayorkas
as 21-5026
Defendant / Appellee:
David P. Pekoske, Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and Alejandro N. Mayorkas, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Lawrence Niskey
Hylton v. Decker
as 21-145
Respondent:
Director Thomas Decker, in his official capacity as Field Office Director, New York City Field Office, U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement, Acting Secretary Chad F. Wolf, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Acting Attorney General Monty Wilkinson, in his official capacity as Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice and others
Petitioner:
Gabrae Hylton
Adil Abuzeid, et al v. Alejandro Mayorkas, et al
as 21-5003
Defendant / Appellee:
Peter Gaynor, Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Kirt Thompson, Acting Director, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Jeffrey Rosen, Acting Attorney General of the United States and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Melissa Anne Abuzeid and Adil Mohamed Abuzeid, M.D.
Kelvin Hernandez Roman, et al v. Chad Wolf, et al
as 20-56329
Petitioner:
MIGUEL AGUILAR ESTRADA, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, BEATRIZ ANDREA FORERO CHAVEZ and KELVIN HERNANDEZ ROMAN
Respondent:
MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, Deputy Director and Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Director, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, DAVID MARIN, Director of the Los Angeles Field Office, Enforcement and Removal Operations, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, JAMES JANECKA, Warden, Adelanto ICE Processing Center and others
Mtaza v. Wilkinson
as 20-11220
Petitioner / Appellant:
Amon Rweyemamu Mtaza
Respondent / Appellee:
William P. Barr, U.S. Attorney General, Chad F. Wolf, Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Matthew Albence, Acting Director, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Hernandez-Aviles v. Decker
as 20-3995
Petitioner:
Noe Hernandez-Aviles
Respondent:
Attorney General William P. Barr, in his official capacity as Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, Director Thomas Decker, in his official capacity as Field Office Director, New York City Field Office, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Acting Secretary Chad F. Wolf, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Kelvin Hernandez Roman, et al v. Chad Wolf, et al
as 20-56257
Petitioner:
MIGUEL AGUILAR ESTRADA, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, BEATRIZ ANDREA FORERO CHAVEZ and KELVIN HERNANDEZ ROMAN
Respondent:
MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, Deputy Director and Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Director, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, DAVID MARIN, Director of the Los Angeles Field Office, Enforcement and Removal Operations, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, JAMES JANECKA, Warden, Adelanto ICE Processing Center and others
Vazquez Barrera v. Pekoske
as 20-20617
Respondent:
United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Matthew Albence, Randy Tate and others
Petitioner:
Phillip Bakasa, Bassam Jebril, Maria Eugenia Escobar Milano and others
Martinez Roman v. Decker
as 20-3974
Respondent:
Chad F. Wolf, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Thomas Decker, in his official capacity as Field Office Director, New York City Field Office, U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement and William P. Barr, in his official capacity as Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice
Petitioner:
Marco Antonio Martinez Roman
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
