Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Howell v. State of Mississippi et al
as 1:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
April Mae Howell
Defendant:
State of Mississippi, Delbert Hosemann, Secretary of State Michael Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv03179
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reardon v. City of Oxford, MS et al
as 3:2021cv00118
Defendant:
Deputy Courtney Dixon, Lynn Fitch, Lafayette Co Prosecutor Bela J Chain and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Oliver Reardon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00281
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lee v. Mosbacher Energy et al
as 3:2014cv00495
Plaintiff:
James Edward Lee
Defendant:
Mosbacher Energy , Spooner Petroleum Co., Mississippi State Oil and Gas Board and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Judd v. Secretary of State of Mississippi et al
as 3:2013cv00305
Plaintiff:
Keith Judd
Defendant:
Secretary of State of Mississippi and Barack Obama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Taitz et al v. Democrat Party of Mississippi et al
as 3:2012cv00280
Plaintiff:
Orly Taitz, Brian Fedorka, Laurie Roth and others
Defendant:
Democrat Party of Mississippi , Secretary of State of Mississippi , Barak Hussein Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Judd v. Secretary of State of Mississippi et al
as 1:2011cv00138
Plaintiff:
Keith Russell Judd
Defendant:
Secretary of State of Mississippi and State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Judd v. Secretary of State of Mississippi et al
as 3:2011cv00351
Plaintiff:
Keith Russell Judd
Defendant:
Secretary of State of Mississippi and State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
