Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Security Seed and Chemical, Inc. v. Duvall et al
as 1:2018cv00123
Defendant:
Nathan Wayne Duvall, Jamie Long Duvall, Brandi Martin Duvall and others
Plaintiff:
Security Seed and Chemical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Security Seed and Chemical, Inc. v. Affinity Farms et al
as 3:2018cv00472
Defendant:
Donna Clark Pottinger, Leah Hagan Pottinger, Butler Ramey Pottinger, IV and others
Plaintiff:
Security Seed and Chemical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Security Seed and Chemical, Inc. v. Upstream, Inc. et al
as 5:2018cv00088
Plaintiff:
Security Seed and Chemical, Inc.
Defendant:
Upstream, Inc. , Paul Hoyt Choate and Evelyn Renee' Choate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Security Seed and Chemical, Inc. v. Cupps et al
as 2:2017cv00142
Plaintiff:
Security Seed and Chemical, Inc.
Defendant:
Daniel Dwayne Cupps and Sandra K. Cupps
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Security Seed and Chemical, Inc. v. Manning Farms, L.L.C. et al
as 5:2017cv00124
Plaintiff:
Security Seed and Chemical, Inc.
Defendant:
Manning Farms, L.L.C. , Anthony Lynn Manning and Teresa Gail Manning
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv00160
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
In re: Roger French
as 16-8046
Debtor:
In re: ROGER DARYL FRENCH and DENA FRENCH
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SECURITY SEED AND CHEMICAL, INC.
Defendant - Appellant:
ROGER DARYL FRENCH
Defendant:
DENA FRENCH
Security Seed and Chemical, Inc. v. French et al
as 4:2014cv00093
Plaintiff:
Security Seed and Chemical, Inc.
Defendant:
Roger Daryl French and Dena G. French
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WILDERMAN et al v. SECURITY SEED AND CHEMICAL, INC.
as 3:2014cv00066
Defendant:
SECURITY SEED AND CHEMICAL, INC.
Plaintiff:
ANGELA L WILDERMAN and LEON WILDERMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
