Cases 31 - 40 of 98
Sally Borghese v. US
as 23-1260
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SALLY BORGHESE
Plaintiff:
LAURIE REYNOLDS, CECELIA EVERTEZ, RAYMOND SIPULT and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
BEATRICE RIVERA ADAMS, AUDREY LESSNER, KIMBERLY VIFINKLE and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOE BIDEN, President of the United States Department, KAMALA D. HARRIS, Vice President of the United States and others
Kimberly Vifinkle v. US
as 23-1248
Plaintiff:
BRANDEE RITSEMA, LAURIE REYNOLDS, CECELIA EVERTEZ and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
BEATRICE RIVERA ADAMS, AUDREY LESSNER, LORA BYERS and others
Not Yet Classified:
KIMBERLY VIFINKLE
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOE BIDEN, President of the United States Department, KAMALA D. HARRIS, Vice President of the United States and others
Renesha Tomlin v. US
as 23-1258
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RENESHA TOMLIN
Plaintiff:
LAURIE REYNOLDS, CECELIA EVERTEZ, RAYMOND SIPULT and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
BEATRICE RIVERA ADAMS, AUDREY LESSNER, KIMBERLY VIFINKLE and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOE BIDEN, President of the United States Department, KAMALA D. HARRIS, Vice President of the United States and others
Alan Meddows v. US
as 23-1272
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALAN MEDDOWS
Plaintiff:
LAURIE REYNOLDS, CECELIA EVERTEZ, RAYMOND SIPULT and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
BEATRICE RIVERA ADAMS, AUDREY LESSNER, KIMBERLY VIFINKLE and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOE BIDEN, President of the United States Department, KAMALA D. HARRIS, Vice President of the United States and others
Kristen Clark-Hassel v. US
as 23-1261
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KRISTEN CLARK-HASSEL and KRISTEN CLARK-HASSELL
Plaintiff:
LAURIE REYNOLDS, CECELIA EVERTEZ, RAYMOND SIPULT and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
BEATRICE RIVERA ADAMS, AUDREY LESSNER, KIMBERLY VIFINKLE and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOE BIDEN, President of the United States Department, KAMALA D. HARRIS, Vice President of the United States and others
Emily O'Dell v. US
as 23-1216
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EMILY O'DELL and WILLIAM O'DELL
Plaintiff:
BRANDEE RITSEMA, LAURIE REYNOLDS, CECELIA EVERTEZ and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
BEATRICE RIVERA ADAMS, AUDREY LESSNER, BEATRICE RIVERA and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOE BIDEN, President of the United States Department, KAMALA D. HARRIS, Vice President of the United States and others
Elizabeth Andrews v. US
as 23-1164
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ELIZABETH ANDREWS
Plaintiff:
LAURIE REYNOLDS, CECELIA EVERTEZ, RAYMOND SIPULT and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
BEATRICE RIVERA ADAMS, AUDREY LESSNER, BEATRICE RIVERA and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOE BIDEN, President of the United States Department, KAMALA D. HARRIS, Vice President of the United States and others
Davis et al v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 6:2023cv01010
Defendant:
Wichita Clinic, P.A., Klenda Mitchell Austerman Zuercher L.L.C., United States Department of Justice and others
Plaintiff:
Carla Davis and Jalen Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jessica Kirby v. US
as 23-1219
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JESSICA KIRBY
Plaintiff:
BRANDEE RITSEMA, LAURIE REYNOLDS, CECELIA EVERTEZ and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
BEATRICE RIVERA ADAMS, AUDREY LESSNER, BEATRICE RIVERA and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOE BIDEN, President of the United States Department, KAMALA D. HARRIS, Vice President of the United States and others
Brandee Ritsema v. US
as 23-1162
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRANDEE RITSEMA
Plaintiff:
LAURIE REYNOLDS, CECELIA EVERTEZ, RAYMOND SIPULT and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
BEATRICE RIVERA ADAMS, AUDREY LESSNER, BEATRICE RIVERA and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOE BIDEN, President of the United States Department, KAMALA D. HARRIS, Vice President of the United States and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
