Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Hambleton v. Dicostanzo et al
as 1:2023cv00377
Plaintiff:
Michael Benjamin Hambleton
Defendant:
Melissa Dicostanzo, Andrew Davis, Deputy Troy Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tubbs v. Miller et al
as 2:2022cv01413
Plaintiff:
James C. Tubbs
Defendant:
Jamie Miller, C/O James, James Harrison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Douglas v. Young et al
as 6:2022cv01004
Plaintiff:
Dameion Douglas
Defendant:
Stuart Young, Daryl Borello, Chaplain Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watts v. Novak
as 1:2022cv00512
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray Watts
Defendant:
Logan Novak, Deputy Steven Josephson, Corporal Kellan Feyerharm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gosney v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2021cv01511
Plaintiff:
Donald Allen Gosney
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Corrections, Dr. Warren Roberts, Dr. Thomas Bristol and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LeRay v. Tommy et al
as 3:2021cv01461
Plaintiff:
Albert G. LeRay
Defendant:
Tommy, Sheriff Mikk Reevz, Officer Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whaley v. Campos et al
as 2:2021cv01254
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Whaley
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Corrections, Two Rivers Correctional Institution, Brigitte Amsberry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Burger et al
as 3:2021cv01131
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Armand Harris
Defendant:
Russel Burger, Detective Travis Ian, Multnomah County Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Singh v. Lynch et al
as 6:2021cv01124
Plaintiff:
Rotish Vikash Singh
Defendant:
Krysta Lynch, Oregon Department of Corrections, L. Irving and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rossi v. Harrold et al
as 6:2021cv00056
Defendant:
Deputy C. Santini, Sheriff Clifton Harrold and Sergeant J. Olsen
Plaintiff:
Mathew W. Rossi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
