Cases 41 - 50 of 214
Franco v. City of Boulder, Colorado
as 22-1088
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SAGE B. FRANCO, as personal representative of the Estate of Seth Garrett Franco
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF BOULDER, COLORADO
Defendant:
DILLON GARRETSON, Officer, STEPHEN COON, Officer, ASHLY FLYNN, Officer and others
Franco v. City of Boulder, Colorado
as 22-1075
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SAGE B. FRANCO, as personal representative of the Estate of Seth Garrett Franco
Defendant / Appellant:
CITY OF BOULDER, COLORADO
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00395
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Nelson v. Russell et al
as 1:2022cv00195
Petitioner:
Brett Andrew Nelson
Respondent:
Ben Russell, David Waite, Kenneth Murray Plotz and others
Nelson v. Jackson et al
as 1:2022cv00181
Plaintiff:
Brett Andrew Nelson
Defendant:
Donald Corwin Jackson, Lori Beth Talbot, Ashley Morgan Burgemeister and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nelson v. Russell et al
as 1:2022cv00175
Plaintiff:
Brett Andrew Nelson
Defendant:
Ben Russell, David Waite, Kenneth Murray Plotz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ogden Regional Airport Association et al v. Ogden City Airport et al
as 1:2021cv00075
Plaintiff:
Durbano Properties, Wendy Marsell, Wayne Law and others
Defendant:
Ogden City Airport and Ogden City
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bryan v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2021cv00456
Defendant:
Andrew Saul and Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Seth Bryan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 7422
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00434
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Thirsk v. Elder et al
as 1:2021cv01205
Plaintiff:
Seth Adam Thirsk
Defendant:
Bill Elder, Alvin (I) Gillespil, Bill (I) Elder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
