Cases 31 - 40 of 406
LINS v. PENNSYLVANIA SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS et al
as 5:2021cv03975
Plaintiff:
SETH LINS
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS, NICOLE WILSON, LISA GERMANIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STOCKHOLM v. MCKESSON CORP. et al
as 2:2021cv20043
Plaintiff:
SETH STOCKHOLM
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORP, MERCK & CO INC and MERCK SHARP AND DOHME CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
EL v. WOLF et al
as 2:2021cv02520
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, JIYA RABEVETSKY, GOEHRING, RUTTER, AND BOEHM and others
Plaintiff:
DELILAH PASSE EL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rehfuss v. Spaulding
as 1:2021cv00677
Respondent:
Stephen Spaulding
Petitioner:
Seth Rehfuss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
GLOVER v. WINGARD et al
as 2:2021cv01644
Plaintiff:
CARLOW GLOVER and CARLOS MUHAMMAD
Defendant:
MARY ANN SWIFT, P/O/ KEITH QUICK, P/O CPL. W SHIELDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SALLEY v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2021cv00291
Defendant:
PHILA. COUNTY, OFFICER JOHNNY HIGHTOWER, OFFICER CRYSTAL WILLIAMS and others
Plaintiff:
MARQUISE SALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lawyer v. Sprague et al
as 1:2020cv02441
Defendant:
Trooper Seth Sprague, Trooper Gary Hibner, Trooper Grant Spiegle and others
Plaintiff:
Audrianna Louise Lawyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bracey v. BETANCOURT
as 2:2020cv06205
Defendant:
TROOPER SETH BETANCOURT
Plaintiff:
Patrice Bracey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PEDRO v. MAMMUTH & ROSENBERG et al
as 2:2020cv05905
Plaintiff:
CARMENCITA MARIA PEDRO
Defendant:
ESQUIRE JESSICA M. KEOUGH, ANNETTE V. URIONDO, ESQUIRE WILLIAM H. PUGH, V and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GARDNER v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2020cv04865
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, JOHN MCNESBY, RAYMOND HARLEY and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY GARDNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
