Cases 1 - 10 of 387
JACKSON v. KELSAW et al
as 1:2024cv01453
Respondent:
MARK SEVIER, CHRISTINA GRAYER, MIA KELSAW and others
Petitioner:
KEVIN JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
COBB v. NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2024cv00415
Plaintiff:
DE'QUAN A. COBB
Defendant:
NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and M. SEVIER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LONG v. CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA LLC et al
as 1:2024cv01357
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA LLC and MARK SEVIER
Plaintiff:
JOHN TYLER LONG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
WILDER v. CENTURION OF INDIANA AND EMPLOYEES et al
as 1:2024cv01326
Defendant:
JONES, CENTURION OF INDIANA AND EMPLOYEES, VANDERVORT and others
Plaintiff:
EARL D. WILDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CRAIG v. SEVIER et al
as 1:2024cv01329
Plaintiff:
COREY ALLEN CRAIG
Defendant:
HAMRICK, COMMISSIONER and MARK SEVIER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TOMPKINS v. SEVIER
as 1:2024cv01285
Petitioner:
JOHN TOMPKINS
Respondent:
SEVIER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BELLANTI v. SEVIER
as 1:2024cv01241
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY BELLANTI
Defendant:
MARK SEVIER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. GEO GROUP INC. et al
as 1:2024cv01129
Defendant:
GEO GROUP INC., CARTER, JAEKAR and others
Plaintiff:
SHAWN JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PLATO v. SEVIER
as 1:2024cv01081
Petitioner:
ROBERT J. PLATO
Respondent:
MARK SEVIER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MARSHALL v. ARAMARK, LLC. et al
as 1:2024cv00991
Defendant:
MOUSER, JOHN DOE, GEO GROUP INC and others
Plaintiff:
AUGUSTUS MARSHALL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
