Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Dean v. Dame et al
as 1:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Edward Lee Dean
Defendant:
Ofc. Dame, Sgt. Smith, LT. Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Dean v. Lim et al
as 1:2024cv00020
Defendant:
Ofc./Sgt. Readon, FSS Lim, Sgt. Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Lee Dean
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Lee v. Smith et al
as 1:2023cv01154
Plaintiff:
Nathan T Lee and Nathan Thomas Lee
Defendant:
Sgt Smith and (SCDC) South Carolina Dept. of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Emilien v. Reynolds et al
as 0:2021cv01647
Defendant:
Don Reynolds, Scott Captain Weeks, Don Evans and others
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Ahmen Emilien and Johnathan Ahren Emilien
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Porter et al
as 6:2017cv02105
Plaintiff:
Garrin David Smith
Defendant:
D Porter, W Mann, J F Cole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curles v. Greenville County Jail and Its Employees Involved
as 4:2017cv01765
Plaintiff:
Jimmy B.K. Curles
Defendant:
Ms Mitchell, Ms Sermons, Asst. Warden Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pressley v. Reynolds et al
as 5:2015cv01956
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Pressley
Defendant:
C Reynolds, Warden Davis, Warden Nolan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pearson v. Stevenson et al
as 9:2014cv00454
Plaintiff:
Cody J Pearson
Defendant:
Capt J Stevenson, Lt Tompkins, Sgt Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arnold v. Smith et al
as 9:2013cv01273
Plaintiff:
Jonathan M Arnold
Defendant:
Sgt Smith, Lt Cashwell, Perry Corr Inst and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
McGaha v. Tillford et al
as 6:2011cv00377
Plaintiff:
Marshall Dewitt McGaha
Defendant:
Mr Tillford, Sgt Smith, Scotty Bodiford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
